Legal Opinion
Finch ex rel. Moe v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 3, 2007No. 04 Civ. 1668 SASPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*524 OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Barbara Finch, Carol Jordan and Barbara Ortiz, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated,1 allege that their rights under the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated.2 In particular, plaintiffs claim that they were adversely affected by inordinate delays in the scheduling of administrative hearings in which they challenged their listing as subjects of “indicated” reports of child abuse/maltreatment in the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (“SCR” or…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Dowd v. DeMarcoDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Finch v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Van Oss v. New York StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.