Mobley v. Sasser
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) If any one of the several grounds of the general demurrers is good, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit. Exercising our discretion we will discuss only two grounds of the demurrers.
First, that the right of action is not in the superintendent of banks, but is in creditors. It is apparent that each of these suits is based upon the provisions of section 2220 of the Civil Code of 1910. This section is not a legislative enactment, but a codification of the principle announced in Burns v. Beck & Gregg Hdwe. Co., 83 Ga. 471…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hines v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Burns v. Beck & Gregg Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Higdon v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Howard v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Rucker v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Rucker v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934