Legal Opinion

Dallam v. Hedrick

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 27, 1990No. 64,332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Defendants Lance D. Hedrick and Nancy E. Hedrick appeal from a conditional order of enforcement of an installment land contract forfeiture clause. The Hedricks defaulted by ceasing to make payments. We affirm.

The contract with which this litigation is concerned is a contract for deed entered into by and between plaintiff John P. Dallam III, as seller, and the Hedricks, as buyers, on December 12, 1986. These are the now pertinent provisions of the contract:

“[F]or the consideration hereinafter specified, the seller hereby sells, and agrees to convey to [the] buyer, the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. McKinney, Administrator v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  4. Stephens v. BertrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Hartman v. NordquistCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  2. Resolution Trust v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  3. Dawson v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  4. Bates v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API