Legal Opinion
United States v. Wishart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2005No. 02-10497PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Donald Wishart appeals the judgment and sentence imposed by the district court after the court found him guilty on all seven counts of an indictment relating to various tax offenses. Wishart contends that he was denied his rights to due process, a fair trial, and self-representation because of the district court’s failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the conviction but remand the sentence to the district court “for the purpose of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Tellez VERDIN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Letantia Bussell, United States of America v. Letantia BussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Richard H. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Benitez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- (PC) Goff v. WaltersDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Freeman v. SchwartzDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Griffin v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- HUMPHRIES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPEMENTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.