Legal Opinion
Pierce v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 13, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss, Rule 12(b)(1) (lack of subject jurisdiction); State law claims; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, 12131, 12132; Administrative Procedure Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 701,702.
OPINION DISMISSING COMPLAINT
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before this court is defendant the United States’ (“the government”) motion to dismiss the complaint in the above-captioned action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), Docket No. 14, filed June 5, 2014. In the complaint, pro se plaintiff Ronald…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ealy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Albra v. Bd. of Trs. of Miami Dade Coll.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Albra v. Board of Trustees of Miami Dade CollegeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Arunachalam v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Ricks v. DMA CompaniesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.