Legal Opinion
Coregis Insurance v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 30, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-573PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Coregis Insurance Company (“Coregis”), has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 56. Coregis seeks a court determination in its favor that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify the defendants Barat-ta & Fenerty, Ltd., and Anthony Baratta (collectively “Baratta”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The underlying controversy from which this declaratory judgment action originates is a medical malpractice suit in which the defendants Kenneth Lee and Danielle Lee (collectively the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- William Selko v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq. Kenneth Lee Danielle Lee Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. FojaniniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Coregis Ins Co v. Baratta & FenertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001