Legal Opinion

Fawell v. Loop Building Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1941No. Civ. 2768PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting the plaintiff’s title to certain parcels of real property.

Prior to 1929 the lots in question were owned by C. A. DeCoo and had been registered under the Land Title Law, commonly known as the Torrens Land Title Law, in the name of DeCoo. On March 25, 1929, DeCoo conveyed the property to his sister, the plaintiff and respondent here, who lived in Chicago. The deeds were recorded and later sent to Mrs. Fawell, who still retained them at the time of the trial. However, these conveyances were not registered under the Land Title Law and no new certificate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Carlson v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Congdon v. G. M. H. Wagner & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Loop Building Co. v. FredenhagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Catalina S. Wells, Individually, and as Attorney in Fact for Everett Roy Wells v. Francisco S. LizamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Warden v. Wyandotte Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. United States v. 3.08 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1962
  4. Fawell v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API