Legal Opinion
Catalina S. Wells, Individually, and as Attorney in Fact for Everett Roy Wells v. Francisco S. Lizama
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1968No. 21798PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal as to all defendants in an action to declare three deeds, absolute on their face, to be mortgages.
The court found that plaintiff’s husband in 1964 was the owner of record of two lots located in Asan, Guam, improved with two two-room apartments, wherein plaintiff, her husband and her eight children lived. The property was mortgaged to the Bank of America for $5,800. Plaintiff’s husband originally met the payments due to the Bank of America, but then ceased making them. Plaintiff borrowed from one Vicente Cruz $537.27 to bring…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. FewkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Abrahamson v. SundmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Sterling National Bank v. FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knaefler v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Guam Scottish Rite Bodies, a Fraternal Organization v. Joseph Flores, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Francisco v. LookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Francisco v. LookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Gov't of Guam v. Core Tech Inter'l Corp.Superior Court of Guam · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.