Legal Opinion
Harry E. Knauff, Jr. and Carolyn R. Knauff v. Nathan T. Hovermale and Sarah E. Hovermale
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 2012No. 52A05-1111-PL-584PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Harry E. Knauff, Jr. and Carolyn R. Knauff appeal the trial court judgment quieting title in certain real property in the names of Nathan T. Hovermale and Sara E. Hovermale following a bench trial. The Knauffs present three issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred when it determined that the Knauffs had not met their burden to prove adverse possession.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 6, 1983, the Knauffs purchased a landlocked 20-acre parcel and a 26-acre parcel from Donald E. Ensley in Miami…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Kwolek v. SwickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hoose v. DoodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Daisy Farm Ltd. Partnership v. MorrolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- James Albert Costello and Lisa Renee Costello v. Wayne Zollman and Teresa Zollman (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Penni Williams v. John Mark WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013