Legal Opinion

Ayotte v. United Services, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 5, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal from separate decisions of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, Dun-leavy Law Offices, P.A., 1 of Presque Isle challenges the Commission’s authority under the Workers’ Compensation Act to regulate the fees an employee’s attorney can charge a client for representation under the Act. Dunleavy is attempting to collect attorney fees from his employee clients, Ayotte and Ladner, in excess of those awarded by the Commission and paid by the employers’ insurer in these cases. The Hartford Insurance Company [hereinafter “Hartford”] insures both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crosby v. WORKERS'COMP.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. City of Portland v. JacobskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Kelley v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. CropleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. Maine Milk Producers, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural ResourcesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mieras v. DyncorpNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Appeal of BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. Lucas v. E.A. Buschmann, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Marsella v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. O'NEAL v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API