Legal Opinion

State v. Ruiz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1980No. CR-80-10PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The style of this case may be misleading because it involves only the attorneys’ fee portion of the second trial of Ruiz and Denton. This opinion does not attempt to reach any part of the trial in chief on its merits.

After the second Ruiz and Denton trial was completed the attorneys, Ike Laws, Joseph Cambiano and Thomas M. Carpenter, petitioned the court for appropriate attorneys’ fees. The fees were to be paid by Logan County, even though the trial was held in Conway County on change of venue.

The trial court considered the claim for attorneys’ fees on the merits of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Jones v. MearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Pulaski County ex rel. Mears v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Oliver H. Fooks, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Makemson v. Martin CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API