Legal Opinion
Grace v. Ansul, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 30, 1999No. 98 C 3172PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Daniel Grace (“Grace”) has sued Ansul, Inc. (“Ansul”), asserting that his termination by Ansul violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. Grace seeks compensatory and punitive damages in addition to equitable relief, attorneys’ fees and court costs.
Ansul now moves for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. Both sides have complied with this District Court’s General Rule (“GR”) 12(M) and 12(N), 1 and the motion is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons set out in this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ford v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000