Legal Opinion
United States v. Grunewald
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
An examination of Exhibit 133 for identification (Grunewald’s Grand Jury testimony of Nov. 16, 1953) discloses that Grünewald was fully and clearly advised of his Fifth Amendment privilege and that he voluntarily proceeded to answer all questions.
The record also shows beyond dispute (page 5 of Exhibit 133 for identification) that until Grünewald had the opportunity to consult his counsel, he was given the unqualified and unconditional privilege to decline to answer any question without stating any reason for his refusal.
At pages 5-6 the following appears:
“Mr. Newcomb:…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. IannielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- United States v. Frank Joseph LachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- People v. CorboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- People v. Galarotti, New York County Courts1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.