Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Joseph Lach

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 13, 1989No. 88-5411PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Frank Joseph Lach appeals from his conviction on two counts of criminal contempt for willfully disobeying two separate court orders to testify in grand jury proceedings, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401 (1982). We affirm.

I

In February 1986, Lach was convicted for conspiring with Sam Urbana, owner of a Miami, Florida pawn shop known as “A New Hocke Shoppe,” to transport stolen property in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2314 (1982), and, subsequently, was sentenced to five years imprisonment. On the date of his sentencing, April 23, 1986, Lach appeared before a federal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Francis Larkin and Francis BolducCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Jeffrey David Howard, Ricky Leroy Stanley, Derrick Smith, Samuel J. Cooper, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. John Fred ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  5. United States v. SantiagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API