Legal Opinion
Muller Corp. Zurich v. Gazocean International, ,S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1975No. 75 Civ. 174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Defendants Gazocean International, S. A.; Gazocean France; Gazocean Armement; Technigaz France; Mundo Gas, S.A.; Petromar Societe Anonyme; and Rene Boudet move to dismiss this action as barred by both the doctrine of res judicata and by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons stated herein, the motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Facts
The complaint under attack (the Second Complaint) was filed by the plaintiff just two weeks after the Court of Appeals had affirmed this court’s order dismissing a prior…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Fred Engelhardt, D/B/A Engelhardt's Camera Store v. Bell & Howell Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drescher v. Hoffman Motors Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. Harry Nace Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- David v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. Harry Nace CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989