Legal Opinion

Harris v. Duarte

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1903No. L.A. No. 1075PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to quiet title to a strip of land in Los Angeles, about one hundred and fifty feet in width, bounded on the north by Jefferson Street, and extending from Alameda Street on the east to the line of Glass's land on the west. In the tract bounded by Jefferson Street on the north, Alameda Street on the east, the land of Glass on the west, and the land of Stanway on the south, there are approximately eleven and a half acres, and the strip in controversy, containing about one and one half acres, is bounded on the south by the north line of the southernmost ten acres of the whole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mills v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Porter v. CountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Taylor v. Northern Electric Ry. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Olds v. ThoringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API