Legal Opinion

General Ceramics Co. v. Schenley Products Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The plaintiff’s first cause of action was dismissed for failure of proof. One of the necessary items of proof held insufficiently established was that relating to the authority of defendant’s purchasing agent to make the contract pleaded in the first cause of action. The contract so asserted was an oral one for the manufacture and sale by plaintiff to defendant of 5,000,000 bottle stoppers.

Plaintiff attempted to prove the agent’s authority by reading a deposition of one of the defendant’s officers taken on an examination of defendant as an adverse party before trial.

Two issues are sought to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance of Hartford v. ShearmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Miners & Merchants' Bank v. Ardsley Hall Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Tieman v. Davies, Turner & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Goell v. United States Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. Gottfried v. GottfriedNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bacall v. Daniel Jones Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1962
  5. Cusumanu v. Pitzer Trucking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API