Shinn v. Stemler

Per Curiam,

The present appeal represents appellant’s third appearance before this Court in relation to the same judgment. This is her second endeavor to bring about the opening of the judgment entered against her by confession on February 10,1943, upon a sealed judgment note for the sum of $1,200. The first petition was dismissed for the reason that want of consideration, the sole ground therein relied upon, is not a defense to a sealed obligation (Shinn et al. v. Stemler, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 350, 45 A. 2d 242). While appellant was prosecuting the first appeal, the appellees proceeded with…