Legal Opinion

Breiggar Properties, L.C. v. H.E. Davis & Sons, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2002No. 20000882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

1 1 Breiggar Properties, L.C., ("Breiggar") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of H.E. Davis & Sons, Inc. ("Davis"). Because Breiggar's complaint was barred by the three-year statute of limitations in section 78-12-26(1) of the Utah Code, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 In reviewing a trial court's grant of summary judgment, we view all the facts and the reasonable inferences drawn from them in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. E.g., Pigs Gun Club, Inc. v. Sanpete County, 2002 UT 17, T7, 42 P.8d 379.

3 Davis entered into an agreement with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Horton v. Goldminer's DaughterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Walker Drug Co., Inc. v. La Sal Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kowalski, B. v. TOA PA V, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API