Legal Opinion

Howell v. Clyde

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1997No. COA96-1264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In this controversy regarding an easement granted to plaintiffs predecessors in title, defendant contends the court erroneously concluded that the recording statute, N.C.G.S. § 47-18 (1984), protected plaintiff as a bona fide purchaser for value from oral termination of the easement. We reverse the trial court.

Pertinent facts and procedural history include the following: In an agreement dated 15 September 1969 and recorded 22 September 1969, Ray A. Warren and spouse Hazel Warren (the Warrens)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawing v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Higdon v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Price v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Rowe v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faulkenberry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API