Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reil v. Billings Processors, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1987No. 87-157Published

1DissentJustice Sheehy

The statement of the majority that “Billings Processors had no actual knowledge of either an injury or a job-induced aggravation of a preexisting condition in this case,” is not founded on fact in the record, and is expressly adverse to the findings of the Workers’ Compensation Court.

The findings of the Workers’ Compensation judge include the following:

“Fourth, claimant testified that he told his supervisors that his work was causing him problems. Admittedly, there are some inconsistencies in claimant’s testimony. There are conflicts between claimant’s testimony and the testimony of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robins v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Roundup Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brurud v. Judge Moving & Storage Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Skrukrud v. Gallatin Laundry Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Miller v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API