Legal Opinion
Mitilenes v. Snead
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
45 N.J. Super. 246 (1957)
132 A.2d 321
VASILIKI G. MITILENES, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE D. MITILENES, AND VASILIKI G. MITILENES, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE D. MITILENES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER SNEAD, ROBERT SNEAD AND CONSTANTINE E. CARRAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 3, 1957.
Decided June 7, 1957.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Edward J. Abromson argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for respondent Constantine E. Carras (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful ManufacturesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. PopovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Palkoski v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- In Re Estate of PfizerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Clark v. Public Service Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Polulich v. JG Schmidt Tool Die & Stamping Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Cestero v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Newman v. Great American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Davis v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- In re the Guardianship of M.D.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2011