Legal Opinion
Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 25, 1949PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Vanderbilt, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Meyer Grobart, Samuel Grobart, Rose Rowitz and Yetta Teitelbaum, from a judgment entered on the pleadings in favor of the defendants, The Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures, in dissolution, and its surviving trustees, individually and as such trustees.
The Society was incorporated in 1791 by a special act of the Legislature, Paterson’s Laws (1800) p. 104. By its charter it was given the right, among other things,- to own real estate within the confines of the Town (now the City) of Paterson…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ChausmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
3Cited by41 opinions
- Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Zoneraich v. Overlook Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Band's Refuse Removal, Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Grobart v. GrobartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.