Legal Opinion

Traci Enfield, et al. v. United States, et al.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 11, 2026No. 6:25-cv-00554Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON TRACI ENFIELD, et al. Case No. 6:25-cv-00554-MTK Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNITED STATES, et al. Defendants. KASUBHAI, United States District Judge: Defendant Eugene Water & Electric Board (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss claims against it for inadequate notice under the Oregon Tort Claim Act (“OTCA”). ECF No. 27. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion is denied. BACKGROUND I. The Parties Plaintiffs are individuals who were harmed by the Holiday Farm Fire (“Fire”). Compl. ¶ 8, ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs include forty-five…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Hamilton Materials, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API