Legal Opinion
In Re Veiga
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 20, 2010No. Misc. Action 10-370(CKK)(DAR), 10-371(CKK)(DAR)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Before the Court are applications by Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) and two of its attorneys, Rodrigo Pérez Pallares (“Pérez”) and Ricardo Reis Veiga (“Veiga”) (collectively, “Applicants”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) for the issuance of subpoenas requiring Respondent Alberto Wray Espinosa (“Wray”) to produce documents and appear at a deposition in Washington, D.C. See 10 Misc. 370, Docket No. [1] (Pérez-Veiga Application); 10 Misc. 371, Docket No. [1] (Chevron Application). Intervening as interested parties are the Republic of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Euromepa S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- John Deere Limited and Deere & Company v. Sperry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Ecuadorian v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- No. 97-5047Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In re Qualcomm Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co., Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hulley Enters. Ltd. v. Baker Botts LLP (In re Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- In re Carlton Masters for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign ProceedingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.