Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kearney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 2014PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PLATT, J.

Appellant, Richard Muliek Kearney, appeals from the judgments of sentence in these four inter-related cases, which were *55consolidated sua sponte by this Court.1 Appellant challenges the trial judge’s decision not to recuse herself, two photo arrays and other identifications, and the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

This is a complicated and convoluted set of cases. The complications were further exacerbated procedurally by Appellant’s substantial, documented disagreements over strategy, tactics, and legal issues (as evidenced in part by his complaints to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. JaynesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. SarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. RaynerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. BlountSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API