State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred “in that it is unable to furnish the defendant with a transcript of his trial so that he may be able to effectively perfect his appeal.” Following the trial the judge of superior court, upon finding defendant to be indigent, appointed the same attorney who had represented him at his trial to represent defendant in connection with this appeal. At the same time the court ordered the court reporter to furnish defendant’s counsel with a transcript of the trial to be paid for at public expense. These orders were entered 20 December…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cressler v. Asheville.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Rogers v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- McAlister v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TeatCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972