Banks v. Yolo County
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. The plaintiff is superintendent of schools of Yolo county, and the action was brought to recover compensation for the sum of four hundred and ninety dollars for services rendered by plaintiff as secretary of the county board of education.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
We do not think that section 1770 of the Political Code as amended by an act approved March 15,1889, which allows five dollars per day to each member of the board of education, including the secretary, for certain services, was repealed by sections 180 and 211 of an act approved the following day (March 16th), amending certain sections of the County Government Act. (Stats. 1889, pp. 191,192, 270, 300.) There is no clause in the latter act expressly repealing any part of the former act; indeed, it has no repealing clause at all. If, therefore, it repeals the former act it must do so…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- State ex rel. Esgar v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Estate of BrewerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Santa Cruz County v. McKnightArizona Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.