Legal Opinion

Smurfit Newsprint Corp. v. Southeast Paper Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 21, 2004No. 03-1445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Smurfit Newsprint Corporation (“Smur-fit”) appeals a grant of summary judgment to Southeast Paper Manufacturing Company, now known as SP Newsprint Company (“SP”). The district court held that the “no-prejudice” rule of New York insurance law should apply to the indemnification provisions of an asset purchase agreement, enabling SP to avoid a potential obligation to indemnify Smurfit. We conclude that, were the New York Court of Appeals presented with this question, it would not apply the rule. We, therefore, reverse the holding of the district court with respect to this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Box v. A & P Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Hofeld v. Nationwide Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Paula HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Smurfit Newsprint Corporation v. Southeast Paper Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API