United States v. Paula Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*218MEMORANDUM *
Paul Richards, Paula Harris, and Bevan Thomas appeal from the district court’s partial denial of their motion to vacate the guilty verdicts returned on thirty-nine counts, including honest services fraud, money-and-property fraud, money laundering, bribery, extortion, false statement, and perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 1341, 1956(a)(1), 666(a)(2), 1951, 1001, and 1623. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing.
1. We affirm the district court’s order vacating the guilty verdicts on counts 10, 11, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39, because those counts do not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PelisamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013