Legal Opinion

State v. Henning

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 2002No. C9-01-1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of driving after revocation and having no driver’s license in his possession, arguing that special series license plates do hot provide an articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle. He also argues that Minn.Stat. § 168.0422 (1998), authorizing traffic stops based solely on special series license plates, is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution. Because we conclude that appellant implicitly consented to these stops and that the statute is not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Ascher v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HenningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. HenningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API