Dell Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Interested Non-Party John Doe l(Doe) appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to quash a subpoena from Plaintiffs-Appellees Dell, Inc., et al. (Dell Plaintiffs) 1 to the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (DOJ). As part of a criminal antitrust investigation into the optical disc drive industry, 2 the FBI made secret tape recordings and transcripts of conversations among various individuals, including Doe, an employee of one of the companies being investigated. Doe, who was initially designated as a subject of the grand jury investigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of Nicholas CataniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Adams v. Symetra Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Heineman v. HindsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Houston Municipal Employees Pension System v. BofI Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.