Legal Opinion

Heineman v. Hinds

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 17, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00448Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Dale Scott Heineman, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00448-JAD-VCF 4 Plaintiff Granting Motion to Dismiss with 5 v. Leave to Amend 6 Stephanie M. Hinds et al., [ECF Nos. 25, 26, 52] 7 Defendants 8 9 Pro se plaintiff Dale Heineman brings this action to contest the denial of his Freedom of 10 Information Act (FOIA) request for grand-jury documents from his 2005 criminal prosecution in 11 the Northern District of California. The defendants move to dismiss his case for failure to state a 12 justiciable claim, arguing that the individuals that Heineman sues…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API