Legal Opinion
State v. Bratrud
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 12, 1996No. 95-3402-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.
Donald Bratrud appeals a battery conviction, after a guilty plea, on the ground that Wisconsin lacked subject matter jurisdiction because there was conflicting evidence in the record about where the crime was committed. However, we conclude that the amended information pleaded facts sufficient to support subject matter jurisdiction, and when Bratrud entered his guilty plea, he admitted those facts. Therefore, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
According to the State's evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, Bratrud was stopped in the City of La Crosse for a traffic violation, at 3:35 a.m. on March 2,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- MacK v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Brozosky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. RachwalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ScaccioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Toler v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- State v. MerryfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.