Ray v. Ripley School Township

*45Dissenting Opinion

Sharp, J.

My disagreement with the majority centers around the meaning of “substantially identical annexation resolution” within the meaning of Acts 1963, ch. 296, § 3, as found in Burns’ Indiana Statutes Annotated, § 28-6203 (1968 Cum. Supp.).

Apparently there are no Indiana cases which directly interpret the words “substantially identical”. However, in Sutto v. Board of Medical Registration and Examination, 242 Ind. 556, 565, 180 N. E. 2d 533 (1962), a majority of our Supreme Court, speaking through Judge Bobbitt, stated:

“We have been furnished no authority defining the…