Legal Opinion

Gonser v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2006No. 44A05-0504-CR-210PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Dustin Gonser brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Gonser raises one issue, which we revise and restate as whether the trial court erred by denying Gonser's motion to suppress. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts follow. On November 8, 2008, the Shipshewana Police Department received a call that a clock had been stolen from a store and received a description of the suspect. Shipshewana Police Officer Tom Fitch was familiar with Gonser and knew that Gonser matched the description of the suspect. Officer Gary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rush v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Caraway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State of Indiana v. Michael E. CunninghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API