State of Indiana v. Michael E. Cunningham
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNES, Judge.
Case Summary
The State appeals the trial court’s granting of Michael Cunningham’s motion to suppress marijuana and a marijuana pipe. We affirm.
Issue
The dispositive issue is whether Cunningham validly consented to a pat-down search that revealed the presence of marijuana on his person and further led to discovery of the pipe in his vehicle.
Facts
In the early morning hours of May 17, 2013, Officer Andrew Hammock of the Huntingburg Police Department pulled over a vehicle driven by Cunningham because one of the two tail lamps of Cunningham’s vehicle was white, not red, because…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Erving Sanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Indiana v. Michael E. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- A.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- State of Indiana v. Michael E. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Indiana v. Michael E. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 2015