Legal Opinion

Rosser v. Rosser

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1938No. 4348PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

It appears in appellees’ compláint that they had filed upon a section of land located in Tp. 25 S., R. 14 W., N. M. P. M., under the homestead laws of the United States, 43 U.S.C.A. § 161 et seq., and, having complied with such laws in reference to acquiring title thereto by patent, had made final proof - before the proper officer of the United States, receiving from him a final certificate, which certificate, upon being presented to the Commissioner of the General Land Office of the United States, would entitle the appellees to a patent for said section of land.

Appellees also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Raher v. RaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Cella Commission Co. v. BohlingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co. v. CurtisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Federal Land Bank v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Melfi v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API