Legal Opinion

Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co. v. Curtis

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1939No. 4463PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Chief Justice.

Defendant filed a plea • in the district court presenting the contention that plaintiff is not the real party in interest. The plea was controverted by plaintiff and a hearing was had, which resulted in an order overruling the plea. Defendant manifested no intention to stand on the ruling and suffer final judgment to be entered against it. To correct that order defendant sued out a writ of error. Plaintiff presents his motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the order denying the plea in abatement is an interlocutory order which does not “practically…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Litteral v. Woods, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Harvey v. MedlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hutchins v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Natural Gas Products Co. v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. RostroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Anaya v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. CarmodyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lujan Grisham v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API