Legal Opinion
BARK
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1972No. 2174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2174 MATTER OF BARK In Deportation Proceedings A-19031067 Decided by Board November 27 ? ibn (1) Where the special inquiry officer who conducted respondent's original hear- ing at Honolulu, Hawaii, was regularly stationed at El Paso, Texas, and was not assigned to Honolulu at the time of the reopened hearing 1 year and 9 months later, he was clearly "unavailable" within the meaning of 8 CFR 242.8(b) so as to permit a substitution of special inquiry officer. Further, objection to substitution of special inquiry officers will not be entertained on appeal to the Board of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Owen C. Leviner v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Crisologo Redondo Campos v. The United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- McGauley v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Marion Patricia Alexiou v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- SESAYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- MARCAL NETOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
- CHRISTO'SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
- Kewan v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006