Legal Opinion
CHRISTO'S
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3831PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 537
(AAO 2015) Interim Decision #3831 Matter of CHRISTO’S, INC. Decided April 9, 20151 U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (1) An alien who submits false documents representing a nonexistent or fictitious marriage, but who never either entered into or attempted or conspired to enter into a marriage, may intend to evade the immigration laws but is not, by such act alone, considered to have “entered into” or “attempted or conspired to enter into” a marriage for purposes of section 204(c) of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- TAWFIKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1990
- HOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- CHAWATHEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diana Jomaa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Daraghma v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Borges BorsoiBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Texperts, Inc.Board of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Victoria Zhuravel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026