Legal Opinion
In Re Viencek
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 15, 2002No. 19-10139PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
STEPHEN D. GERLING, Chief Judge.
Presently under consideration by the Court are two motions filed by Mark F. Viencek (“Debtor”). The first motion was filed on January 4, 2001, asking the Court to expunge the claim of Aurora Loan Services, Inc. (“Aurora”) because “[t]here is simply no debt between this debtor and Aurora.” On March 15, 2001, Aurora filed a response, asserting that it had authority to file and defend the proof of claim it filed on October 25, 1999, and amended November 4,1999.
On May 2, 2001, the Debtor filed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Unioil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Wadsworth v. Yancey Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Greer v. O'DellDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re MinbatiwallaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Morton v. Morton (In Re Morton)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Conde-DedonatoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Kemp v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Kemp)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Kang Jin HwangUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.