Hobby v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, Jeffrey Hobby appeals his conviction for making terroristic threats, 1 arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. Because his actions both before and after his threat to kill his neighbor were violent toward the neighbor, such showed his intent to terrorize his neighbor and corroborated the threat. Accordingly, we affirm.
“The standard of review for an appeal from a criminal bench trial requires us to view the evidence in a light most favorable to support the trial court’s judgment. We determine evidence sufficiency…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Armour v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Maskivish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Drew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clement v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Schneider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Petro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.