Legal Opinion
De Martini v. Scavenger's Protective Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1935No. Civ. 9625PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs sued to recover their portions of dividends and to obtain an injunction prohibiting certain wrongful practices. In deciding the case the trial court made very full and complete findings. From the judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed.
The brief of the defendants proceeds as though they were making their contentions in the trial court, but as that court made full and complete findings they are controlling in this court in so far as they are material and are supportéd by competent evidence. It is necessary, therefore, to briefly summarize the findings.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Cliffs Chemical Co. v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Nichols v. Olympia Veneer CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- In re Lorimier, Greenbaum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Nichols v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Howad B. Silverberg v. Joanne S. BeckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Perata v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- O'HARE v. Marine Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964