Nichols v. Olympia Veneer Company
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent, Olympia Veneer Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling wood products, particularly veneer. The shares of its capital stock have a par value of $1,000 each. The appellant, Matie E. Nichols, is the owner of one of such shares, having acquired it as the heir of her husband, who was one of the original subscribers to the capital stock of the respondent.
The respondent, while organized under the general statutes relating to the formation of manufacturing and business corporations (Rem. Comp. Stat.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
- Nichols v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ramo, Inc. v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.