Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Olympia Veneer Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1926No. 19935. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Olympia Veneer Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling wood products, particularly veneer. The shares of its capital stock have a par value of $1,000 each. The appellant, Matie E. Nichols, is the owner of one of such shares, having acquired it as the heir of her husband, who was one of the original subscribers to the capital stock of the respondent.

The respondent, while organized under the general statutes relating to the formation of manufacturing and business corporations (Rem. Comp. Stat.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Nichols v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Ramo, Inc. v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API