Legal Opinion
O'HARE v. Marine Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1964No. Civ. 21553PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
After sustaining of demurrer to her complaint, plaintiff amended. Defendant corporation and all four individual defendants demurred to the amended complaint. The demurrers were sustained. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend, but formally declined to do so. Judgment of dismissal was entered, and plaintiff appeals.
The amended complaint alleges that: since 1949 plaintiff has owned 35 shares of defendant corporation, which is a minority interest; each individual defendant was and is “an officer and/or director and/or shareholder” of defendant corporation; “over a period of many years” they have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Gordon v. EllimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hagan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander F. Eagle v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Schuster v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Miles, Inc. v. Scripps Clinic & Research FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1993
- Jackson v. MaguireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969