Legal Opinion
People v. Reome
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 2010No. 112PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
Defendant was convicted of participating in a rape with three other men. One of his alleged accomplices, Andrew Hilborn, was the only witness to identify him. The issue is whether Hilborn’s testimony was corroborated as CPL 60.22 (1) requires. We hold that it was.
I
The main witnesses at trial were Hilborn and the victim. Both described a rape by four men. The victim did not identify any of the four, but Hilborn said he participated in the crime with Scott MacDonald, Santino Buccina and defendant. MacDonald, Buccina and Hilborn were connected to the rape by DNA…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People v. BesserNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- People v. RudolphNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- S.B. v. A.C.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. BrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- The People v. Matthew A. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.