Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Gomes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1956No. Civ. 8865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Appellant as executor of the will of Antonio Lucio, deceased, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict in favor of respondent who sued to establish a rejected claim for the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed for deceased.

There was substantial evidence to the following effect: The testator, a widower, died on October 18, 1953, at the age of 85. His grandnephew, appellant herein, was the sole beneficiary under his will. Eespondent, who was a sister-in-law of decedent, had cared for him in her home during the last years of his life. The services began…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Furman v. CraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Winder v. WinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Salazar v. EhmannColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Pierce Engineering Co. v. ChohonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Garrie v. McCauleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API