Legal Opinion

Bohart v. Parker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Lane: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is an action of replevin by W. A. Bohart against James C. Parker.

Read the full summary

From Lane: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is an action of replevin by W. A. Bohart against James C. Parker. On April 8, 1913, one Francis recovered a judgment against Thienes in the sum of $383.75. Execution was issued by virtue of said judgment, and on the 10th day of June, 1913, was levied by the defendant, who was sheriff of Lane County, upon certain personal property then claimed by plaintiff Bohart, by serving notice on A, M. Brewer, a lessee of said Thienes, and attaching certain personal property. Brewer answered that he had in his…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

At the time of the levy the goods were in possession of A. M. Brewer. Plaintiff claims that he bought the property of Thienes on the 3d day of June, 1913.

1. The first assignment of error relates to the refusal of the court to admit in evidence exhibit “B, ” being the lease of the farm by Thienes to Brewer, which we deem immaterial. The only purpose of the offer was to show by what arrangement Thienes left the property in question with Brewer. Plaintiff claims to have acquired the property from Thienes, and Thienes’ title is not questioned.

2. The second assignment is directed against the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oregon Mutual Fire Insurance v. MathisOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Finn v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Finn v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Short v. D. R. B. Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Short v. D. R. B. Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API