Legal Opinion
Giffen v. City of Olathe
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from, Johnson District Court. Injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for the defendant City, and others, at the January term, 1888. The plaintiff Giffen brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
This was an' action for an injunction against the city of Olathe and its officers to restrain them from enforcing certain orders to open portions of certain *343■streets and alleys which had been inclosed by the plaintiff below. The trial court made the following findings of fact:
“1. The defendant is a city of the second class, duly incorporated and organized as such under the laws of the state of Kansas.
“2. In the year 1857, John T. Barton surveyed and laid off the southeast quarter of section 26, and the northeast quarter of section 35, all in township 13, of range 23, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Town of Derby v. AllingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Baker v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Meier v. Portland Cable Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Reilly v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McAlpine v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Gadarl v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Wallace v. CableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- City of Hutchinson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- McCarty v. City of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.